 |
Guides
and manuals of "better practice" as an aid to planning
in England
by Elena Marchigiani -
March 2004 - SICI: 1723-0093(200403)4<T:GAMOBP>2.0.CO;2-U
Part three.
Planning guidelines
3.6. Site-specific Guides. Leicester City Council, St. Georges,
Leicester: Strategic Regeneration Area Framework, 2001
(1)
|
|
 |
|
|
If the text previously described still belongs to a more traditional
set of guidance tools providing guidelines and direct aid in design
implementation, the guide for the regeneration of an area in Leicester
undergoing strong transformation pressures is the result of a
more recent experimentation phase (Fig. 1, 2).
"This document provides an urban design and planning framework
for the St. George's area of Leicester. The framework is not a
master plan. It is a vehicle for facilitating and promoting the
regeneration of St. George's as an attractive place to live, work
and visit" ("Introduction", Leicester City Council
2001).
The first introductory part lists the general objectives
of the guide:
- to provide "both a 'vision' for the area and specific guidance
for key sites;
- [to] promote a mix of land uses at an appropriate density to
ensure vitality and sense
of place;
- [to] identify opportunities for future development and investment
including retail, residential, leisure and employment uses;
- [to] identify potential environmental improvements and the creation
of new public
spaces;
- [to] identify potential for and means of securing improved pedestrian
access and re-unite St George's with the city centre;
- [to] maintain and enhance the historic character of the area;
- [to] consider the potential phasing and timescale implications
of proposed new
development" (Ibid.)
The guide's structure is particularly rich and complex:
1. Introduction
1.1. St. George's Strategic Area Framework
1.2 Purpose of Guidance
1.3 Structure and Content of Guidance
2. Description and Analysis
2.1 Location and boundaries
2.2 Sub Areas
2.3 City Centre Context and Influences
2.4 History
2.5. Current Uses and Ownership Pattern
2.6 Townscape Qualities
2.7 Existing Movement
2.8 Environment
3. Planning contex
3.1 City of Leicester Local Plan (CLLP)
3.2 Other Policies
3.3 The Cultural Strategy
4. Vision and Aims
5. Guiding Principles
5.1 Uses
5.2 Access & Movement
5.3 Urban Design
6. Public Realm
6.1 Enhancement of Existing Routes
6.2 Public Spaces
7. Section 106 Planning Obligation Requirements
8. Affordable Housing
9. Compulsory Purchase Orders
10. Consultation
11. Development Opportunities
11.1 St George's South [S.W.O.T. Analysis, opportunities, key
outputs]
11.2 St George's North [S.W.O.T. Analysis, opportunities, key
outputs]
11.3 St George's East [S.W.O.T. Analysis, opportunities, key outputs]
12. Implementation
13. Contacts
Appendix 1: Listed Buildings
Part two of the document provides a descriptive framework
of the area, which explains the internal organisation of parts
defined on the basis of specific characters. The reading of functional
and mobility aspects, of ownership, historical, morphological
and environmental patterns is oriented to defining enhancement
opportunities and is accompanied by outlines which interpret relations
inside and outside that city area (Fig. 3, 4). This aspect is
particularly evident in the reading of the "Townsacpe qualities",
arising from the reinterpretation of the most traditional Townscape
categories (urban grain and pedestrian permeability, scale, built
form, details and materials, legibility, gateways, strategic views,
open spaces). This analysis is summarised in diagrams, where graphic
image and text display potentialities and elements characterising
the area from a morphological and perceptive standpoint (Fig.
5).
Part three collects a different analysis. Descriptions
deal with what is a real preliminary investigation of the guidances
concerning the area elaborated within urban planning tools in
force (Local plan), conservation and transformation policies (Conservation
Area, City Centre Action Programme), public and private economic
investments, strategies the administration plan to develop for
the creation of new cultural centralities. Parts from seven
to ten go into details about issues linked to implementation
procedures (drawing up of agreements between public and private
parties, compulsory purchase powers, consultation procedures,
etc.)
Part four closes the first descriptive section, explaining
the regeneration objectives ("Vison and aims"). These
objectives, expressed only in verbal terms, are a result of the
analyses carried out and are expressed in guideline criteria for
future developments (quality, place, ease of movement, mixed use,
activity, sustainability). Despite their general character, they
start to shape possible design operations. They are visions because
they purposely offer a vague outline in order to leave room to
the actor's proposals and action strategies linked to the urban
site's physical and functional layout.
This set of guidelines is further specified in part five,
describing "Guiding principles" (once again only in
verbal form) for the spatial and functional definition of undertakings.
First of all, the zoning of the Local plan is partially reinterpreted,
with the aim to identify compatibility criteria between different
uses. This part also provides, as performance requirements, guidance
regarding access and movement system, aimed at making the network
of vehicle and pedestrian routes and public transport lines safer
and more effective. But there are also urban design guidances,
which should grant the quality of future developments: "All
applications for large scale development will be expected to include
a statement setting out the urban design approach adopted and
explaining how proposals relate to the following urban design
principles" ("Urban Design", Ibid.).
These directives provide indications similar to those contained
in some of the texts analysed before and thus further explain
visions and objectives with reference to urban design issues:
quality, place, vitality, sustainability. Actually these directions
do not express proper design principles; however the form of 'directive'
enables to acquire either the function of stimulating proposals
consistent with the proposed objectives and the role of general
criteria for assessing whether these proposals are acceptable.
Within this reasoning which develops following further steps going
deep into the subject, there clearly emerges the priority assigned
to developments regarding public open spaces, taken as driving
forces to launch broader regeneration trends. Part six provides
more specific design guidance on some streets, squares and widenings
in the quarter (Fig. 6).
If on one hand the first sections identify objectives and general
criteria, establishing a first set of rules to be followed by
any project involving St. George area, on the other part eleven
and twelve deal with the construction of a clearer spatial
strategy. A strategy which, despite being only an advice, can
guide the actors involved in the enhancement and reorganisation
of the quarter (Fig. 7). The tool in question for the elaboration
of guidances involving the three parts of the area is the S.W.O.T.
Analysis (Strengths, Opportunities, Weaknesses, Threats) (2)
. Opportunities and strengths, weaknesses and threats are described
for each part. The aim is always to "identify opportunities
for investment; provide detailed development guidance in the form
of annotated plans and sketches; demonstrate the development potential
of key sites; identify opportunities for environmental improvements,
route enhancements and new public spaces; provide models of 'fine-grained'
mixed-use development that demonstrate how different uses can
be successfully integrated" ("Development opportunities",
Ibid.).
The interest of this experience lies in the fact that strategic
development factors - opportunities and strengths - are not presented
only in the form of written statements, but refer to specific
spatial sites. For each site, the definition of strategies and
the identification of procedures to achieve them goes side by
side with the aim to enhance as much as possible the local spatial,
settlement, historic and environmental resources. For this purpose
the detailed preliminary investigation on the conditions of each
area (carried out considering dimensions, quantities, functions,
ownership pattern, actors involved and implementation time) come
along with detailed descriptions on the current physical and functional
characters and schemes showing a possible future spatial layout
(Fig. 8-11).
Note:
1) The text is posted
on: www.rudi.net.
2) Swot analysis originally derives from marketing; it is a matrix
for the technical evaluation of the position on the market of
enterprises and their development opportunities. Recently this
method has been applied to strategic planning, as an aid to programming
and decision-making. Often, however, strengths and weaknesses,
opportunities and threats translate into general advices for the
formulation of abstract policies which are still far from the
real spatial conditions they will have to work in. The explanation
of such procedure within strategic planning models is in (Pavesio
1998), a study carried out for the Turin Strategic Plan, 1998-2000.
|