
|

Dialogues in Urban
and Regional Planning.
Volume 2
edited by Bruce Stiftel,
Vanessa Watson,
Henri Acselrad
Publisher: Routledge/Taylor and Francis
Group
in cooperation with the Global Planning Education Association Network
(GPEAN)
Publication date: 2004 (in UK); 2007 (in US).
Pages: 384
Illustrations: 15 half tones, 16 line figures and 11
tables
ISBN: 9780415402859
ISBN-10: 0415402859
Prize: GB£ 80.00; US$ 150.00
Buying information
www.routledge.com;
catalogue
Order
Volume Two from Routledge
Book review
by Lucio Giecillo(*)
Through a selection of the best urban planning scholarship from
each of the world's planning school associations "Dialogues in Urban
and Regional Planning Volume II" offers a wide overview of the state
of the art of regional planning across the world. All the papers
presented have been previously selected and awarded through a competition
by the Global Planning Association Network (GPEAN). However, the
"academic" character of the book doesn't have to be considered as
a limit. On the contrary, the book presents a significant point
of view on a crucial topic of our time: knowledge formation processes
in the age of globalization. In the introduction, Bruce Stiftel,
Vanessa Watson and Henri Acselrad, editors of the book, underline
what said before as one of the most problematic aspects of their
work, but also as one of the most interesting ones. They maintain
how, in a period of great transformation of the idea of knowledge
itself, it is necessary to start from the "global themes" to measure
the relationship (gap?) between global and local cultures. Thus,
it seems useless to remark that the starting point of the book is
represented by the topic of globalization and its impact on local
knowledge systems.
The rise of globalization has fostered a number of different representations
of the impact of global economy and global power on local socio-spatial
systems. Some of these representations imagine the complete disappearing
through assimilation of local cultures; others depict a process
of homogenization of the methodological and analytical approaches
to city and space. This consideration is very important for example,
at the European level, where the process of integration is progressively
fostering a general convergence of different planning traditions
toward very similar positions. At the global scale, the situation
doesn't seem so different, as long as the increasing pressure of
economy and power seems to impose almost everywhere similar strategies.
All the "stories" contained within this book can be seen as possible
explorations of how planning is treated within different cultural
contexts. Like parts of a greater History, each articles contributes
to clarify and to expose some of the most significant themes of
the contemporary international debate. Organized around a series
of pivotal topics, such as "Economy, urban space and planning",
"Environment and conservation of heritage", "Planning process and
the nature of decision-making", "Planning and gender", and so on,
all the different articles presented explore a universe of theories,
experiences, practices, points o view, of great interest for who
wants to understand some of the main contradictions existing in
the opposition between globalization of knowledge and local cultures.
In the opening essay, entitled "Post-industrialism, post-modernism
and the reproduction of Vancouver's central area: retheorizing the
twenty-first century", the author focuses on the relationship between
globalization of economic processes and its impacts on social urban
life. In the last two decades Vancouver central area has been witnessing
to a general restructuring of its physical and social landscape,
with the location of multinationals, foreign investments in property,
the development of the urban mega-project, and growth of enclaves
of immigrant population. Thus the article tries to understand the
role of planning in introducing public values into the development
process to include public housing and public amenity. A key initiative,
Hutton argues, was the 1991 Central Area Plan, which enabled the
comprehensive reordering of the inner-city space within a complex
process that included diversity, complexity and interdipendency
of territory and land-use.
Beriatos and Gaspodini, like Hutton, focus on the transformation
of urban landscape in Athens during the preparation for the 2004
Olympic Games. The aim is to put in evidence the impact of the intervention
on the built environment and on the relationship between global
and local forces. More specifically their central questions regard
the way in which urban design schemes have contributed, in the era
of globalization, to realize a coherent urban landscape. The background
used by the two authors draws from Zukin's conceptualization of
the relationship between culture and capitalism in the postmodern
age. Thus the attention of the study focuses on the analysis of
the main urban projects realised during the 2004 Olympic Games.
The study concludes that Athens partially followed the international
paradigm, focusing investments on competitive landscape transformations,
based on heritage projects and innovative design. The difference
between Athens and other Western urban realities lies in the scattered
nature of investments across Athens, which could retard positive
economic effects in the short term.
The Donzelot article focuses on the impact of changing economic
and social forces on socio-spatial articulation of the city. The
conclusion is a three-fold urban scheme in which different urban
areas correspond to different social compositions. The first socio-spatial
patterns is represented by the areas of marginalization, e.g. social
housing projects and new towns. The areas of periurbanization (car-dependent
suburbs and gated communities), where there is a majority of middle-class
population; the areas of gentrification that correspond to inner-city
areas occupied by the wealthiest. The article concludes with a reference
to the fact that these areas are not socially homogeneous and that
the interdipendence between the three areas requires that it is
not possible to act on one without considering all three.
The Samadhi article addresses the problem of the relationship between
globalization and identity. The essay, entitled "Reinforcing identity:
urban design concepts for achieving Balinese cities with cultural
identity", focuses the problem of how tourism related economic development
erodes the cultural identity of a place. The author then proposes
the construction of a spatial vocabulary build on the traditional
urban forms of the Balinese tradition. Starting from this understanding,
spatial principles are translated into urban design guidelines,
able to reinforce the traditional forms of the Balinese urban culture.
The topic of globalization, which somehow represent the common
ground of all the essays presented, introduces a second topic, related
to the relationship between planning process, democracy and decision-making.
The March and Low article, entitled "Knowing and steering: mediatization,
planning and democracy in Victoria, Australia", offers a critique
of planning, viewed as an aspect of democratic governance, using
as a case the local planning system of the state of Victoria in
Australia. Starting from Habermas conception of the way policy is
influenced by "steering media" (e.g. low, bureaucracy, money), the
article analyses the relationship between the local government and
the problem of democracy in decision-making processes. From the
analysis of four "dilemmas of democracy", the authors underline
how in most liberal-democratic forms of government there are problems
in achieving a democratic decision-making process. The dilemmas
are: first, the need to include as many people as possible in a
democratic process versus the need to circumscribe the process itself
when decision have to be taken; second, the opposition between concentration
and dispersion of power; third, right-based approach versus utilitarian
approach based on public interest; fourth, equality delivered by
the state and liberty exercised through the market. The authors
conclude that each single institution involved in the functioning
of local democracy can act to remove barriers and limits and to
achieve a correct democratic planning process.
The topic of globalization is also strongly related to the problem
of formation of local culture as in the case of Australian planning.
Freestone article, entitled "The Americanization of Australian planning",
explores the correlations between Australian and American planning
systems. The aim of the study is first to criticize the point of
view that wants that Austalian planning system is "clearly derivate"
of foreign planning ideas. Freestone then deals with Australian-American
ibridations in terms of a concious interchange between the two systems.
More in particular the author states that the formation of Australian
planning system has been following a process of selection of the
Anglo-Saxon planning ideas. Within this process only the ideas that
could better deal with the Australian culture were accepted. Ultimately,
Freestone argues, it has been less the case of an Americanization
of Australian planning and more the Australization of American one.
The existing of multiple intersections between the topics exposed
above and some main aspects of the Italian debate confirms the substantial
continuity between local aspects and the global scenario. This element
allows some conclusive notes on the nature and the utility of this
debate in the analysis of the contemporary condition. A first consideration
regards the need for an open debate between different experiences,
as a fundamental element within the process of knowledge construction.
There is however at least one aspect that must be considered. This
regards first the nature of the process itself, which ultimately
requires a more conscious consideration of the methodological and
analytical criteria applied. For example the increasing claim for
"superlatives" in urban analysis is progressively confusing more
than clarifying the terms of the problem. Ultimately, it seems necessary
to adopt a more careful methodological approach able to put in evidence
the existing gap between reality and its (scientific) representation.
This book represents a step in the direction of a global confrontation
among planning schools across the world, not just in the sense of
cultural exchange but also in terms of a deeper understanding of
the methodological differences existing in each approach. The aim
is hard but the outcome deserves attention, especially for the Italian
university and research that could enrich itself a lot from such
debate.
(*) PhD in Territorial Policies and Local Projects,
Roma Tre University.
 |
|
Download italian version |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contents
| 1. |
Introduction: global commonality and regional
specificity |
| 2. |
Post-industrialization, post-modernism, and the
reproduction of Vancouver's central area: re-theorizing the
21st century |
| 3. |
'Glocalising' urban landscapes: Athens and the
2004 Olympics |
| 4. |
The three-speed city: relagation, periurbanisation,
gentirfication |
| 5. |
The future of rurality under globalization |
| 6. |
Reinforcing identity: urban design concepts for
achieving Balinese cities with cultural identity |
| 7. |
Knowing and steering: mediatization, planning
and democracy in Victoria, Australia |
| 8. |
The instruments for urban reform and the ideal
of citizenship: the current contradictions |
| 9. |
Regional planning and sustainability: limits and
potentials of South Africa's integrated development plans |
| 10. |
The Americanization of Australian planning |
| 11. |
City Planning in the history of the city |
| 12. |
Road expansion, urban growth and induced travel:
a path analysis |
| 13. |
Changing gender contract in self-help housing construction
in Botswana: the case of Lobatse
|
|