|

Giancarlo De Carlo. Inventario
analitico dell'archivio
edited by Francesco Samassa
Paperback: 400 pages
Publisher: Il Poligrafo, 2004
Language: Italian
ISBN: 88 7115 356 1
Prize: € 30,00
-------------------------------------------
Giancarlo De Carlo. Percorsi
edited by Francesco Samassa
Paperback: 480 pages
Publisher: Il Poligrafo, 2004
Language: Italian
ISBN: 88 7115 355 3
Prize: € 32,00
Contents:
Pio Baldi: Foreword
Roberto Sordina: Presentation
Francesco Samassa: Cross-sections of a complex figure
Memories:
Paolo Ceccarelli: GDC
Donlyn Lyndon: Giancarlo De Carlo in the US
Critical essaies:
Peter Blundell Jones: Giancarlo De Carlo: works “professional
activity”
Franco Purini: The work and the theme
Giorgio Ciucci: “Then perhaps, and even by different paths,
art will come”
Francesco Samassa: “A building is not a building is not a
building”. The anarchitecture of Giancarlo De Carlo
Anthology:
Writings by Giancarlo De Carlo
Index of names
Book presentation
The De Carlo fund in the Project Archive of the IUAV
Francesco Samassa
It was 1998 when Giancarlo De Carlo and the Project Archive at
the Venice School of Architecture (IUAV) defined an agreement and
a schedule of work with the objective of depositing, reorganizing,
preserving and making available De Carlo's professional archive.
This program involved more than five years' work and was finally
completed in June 2004 with the publication of the volume “Giancarlo
De Carlo - An Analytic Inventory of the Archive”, the third
in the series (after those dedicated to Giuseppe Torres and Alberto
and Giuseppe Samonà), included in the set of inventories
published by the Project Archive in Venice to give the public of
students and scholars of architecture the opportunity to access
the records preserved in the archive.
These five years have seen a highly articulated series of phases
of work, from the physical processing of the documentary material
(recovered from the premises of Giancarlo De Carlo's firm in Milan
and patiently reorganized, inventoried and catalogued in compliance
with international archival standards), to the establishment on
line of all of the data collected. The result is that today it can
be consulted at the site of the Project Archive (http://www.iuav.it/homepage/ap/)
accompanied by a wealth of images. Here I will seek to illustrate
the final order that was given to the archival fund and briefly
describe its contents.
First of all I should, however, state first two conditions that
constituted a limit to the operation. The first was the fact that
it was necessary to limit acquisition of documents that were no
longer of any operative usefulness for the study, at present in
full activity, so as to not to obstruct the work. This involved
the decision not to include in the work, for example, all those
projects that are so recent that they are still unfinished in all
phases of work (even if subsequent to the design stage in itself);
but also the rich photographic archive that is constantly used for
the many and varied publications that deal with De Carlo and his
work. Obviously this limitation is only temporary, and it is conceivable
that in future it will be superseded. A very different kind of limitation
however, and in this case unfortunately irreversible, is the result
of an episode in February 1972 (precisely documented) when De Carlo
personally destroyed a great deal of material in his archive at
that time, by "thinning out", or even eliminating completely,
the drawings relevant to the various projects he had worked on up
till that time (largely the "minor" projects, if we want
to accept a definition of this type, but it would have been important
to be able to study them today). This created a true gap, the only
really significant one in the record, that did not, however, cancel
all of the documentation of the work done by the firm before February
1972.
With this exception, all of the materials in the fund have been
acquired in a state of preservation that is definitely good, and
above all with an effective organization that we have sought in
most cases to preserve, simply adapting the principles of cataloguing
to those now standardized at the international level for architectural
archives.
The fund is organized in a sequence of four documentary series
and in a sub-fund which in its turn is organized in three other
documentary series: the series of “Acts”, two series
dedicated to graphic materials (“Projects: drawings, reports,
models” and “Projects: digital documents”), the
series of the “Writings” and then, for the sub-fund
dedicated to the architectural review “Space & Society”,
a series of “Correspondence”, one of “Editorial
Materials” and a last section of "Various Materials".
The series of the “Acts” substantially collects all
of the materials related to correspondence produced in the context
of the many-sided work conducted over many years by Giancarlo De
Carlo: these range from his professional practice, naturally, to
his academic activities, publishing and his work of cultural promotion,
without overlooking an infinity of other occasional situations in
which De Carlo was involved in different ways. It amounts to a considerable
volume of documents, variously ordered in the different parts (and
substantially retaining its original organization), of great interest
both by the multiplicity of the authoritative interlocutors with
whom De Carlo kept up a steady correspondence, and by the attitude
(so typical of De Carlo) of treating his correspondence as an important
phase in the development of his thought. As an example I will only
mention the correspondence relative to the participation of De Carlo
as a member of the Board of the Milan Triennale down to 1968 (the
year of the ill-fated exhibition which he curated on the theme of
the “Big Number", which was devastated by demonstrators
on the opening day), or the rich correspondence related to the activity
of Team X, of which De Carlo was one of the most active members
as well as the organizer of two meetings at Urbino (1976) and Spoleto
(1976).
The two series devoted to "Projects" bring together all
of the materials produced in the context of the elaboration of plans
and projects that constitute, in the case of an architect, the principal
corpus of records of his professional activity. Leaving aside for
a moment the series containing digital materials (which raise a
set of new technical problems, which are still open for archival
methodology and require to be explored thoroughly, and would require
for this reason to be dealt with separately), I shall here refer
to the drawings and models and to the accompanying reports that
the De Carlo office developed starting from 1950. It is a collection
of about 10,000 documents related to almost 120 projects: a volume
of material that finally offers the opportunity to study Giancarlo
De Carlo's work systematically on the basis of the original sources.
But the half century of work by the De Carlo firm documented in
the fund, and its substantial integrity, also offers the opportunity
to retrace the great transformation that professional practice underwent,
in technical-material terms, in the course of the second half of
the twentieth century: from the first tracings drawn in pencil and
India ink, to the first radex copies, the heliographic copies and
photocopies, down to today's digitalization of the processes of
graphic drafting (which, as I pointed out, calls for separate treatment).
This observation is important if we are to understand fully that
the importance of an archival fund like that of Giancarlo De Carlo
does not lie only in the opportunity it provides to study Giancarlo
De Carlo himself, but also the possibility to construct other paths
of research, on a very wide range of different subjects.
The series of the “Writings”, finally, brings together
an important collection of documents that has been assembled over
time (and jealously and patiently preserved by Angela Mioni at the
Milan office), relating to the different occasions on which De Carlo
produced a contribution to some subject, whether an interview, a
lecture, a statement at a meeting, a preface to some publication,
an article, the awarding of a prize, or much else. Of special interest
are the texts drafted for numerous interventions at conventions
and public meetings, not only because many of them have remained
unpublished, but also because the original manuscripts have often
been drafted in a way that tells us a lot about De Carlo on those
occasions, with brightly colored underlining and highlighting, diagrams
and small accompanying sketches and marginal notes. Lost in any
printed edition, also like the many traces of the changes of mind
or the notes on the backs of sheets made in the margins of the papers
given by other speakers, all these aspects of the graphic drafting
of the texts often become quite representative of De Carlo's way
of thinking. A small sample that is highly representative of this
important aspect appears in the anthological appendix to the volume
Giancarlo De Carlo. Percorsi published by the Project Archive of
Venice parallel with the volume of the inventory. These writings
are a paradigmatic example of the fundamental importance to scholars
of having access to original sources (and, consequently, of the
decisive importance for study and research for the work conducted
by the archives). Also important, in my opinion, are the texts of
syllabuses and the presentations of the courses, lectures and other
activities within the university that make it possible to reconstruct
faithfully De Carlo's academic activity within the limits of its
contents. This is an aspect on which historical-critical attention
has never been focused, since it has always been limited to considering
only De Carlo's academic career in the passage of the various posts
he held, between the universities of Venice and Genoa. I shall here
limit myself to these few examples, even though there are many other
documents that are equally noteworthy.
Separate treatment is called for by the sub-fund of "Space
& Society", the international review of architecture and
urban planning which De Carlo founded and edited (from the 1970s
down to its closure in 2000), since its materials have no direct
relationship with the materials in the personal and professional
funds. Though the premises of the editorial staff were set, except
in the initial period, in the firm's offices, the review always
had a life that was parallel with but independent of all of De Carlo's
other activities. In this case the archive of the review has been
acquired in the organization given it by Giuliana Baracco, De Carlo's
lifelong companion and the energetic head of the magazine's editorial
staff, and is divided into the three series mentioned above. One
of “Correspondence” relates to all of the epistolary
exchanges with authors, occasional contributors, but also the editorial
staff; there are two of “Materials”: the first related
to the preparatory materials of the different pamphlets (unfortunately
they have been preserved only for the last twenty or so numbers
of the magazine); a second one of "various" materials,
here meaning photographic materials, press cuttings and other documentation
that was collected and preserved as the review's "complex memory",
a collection of notes and cues, the basic fuel for the discussions
and ideas that animated the life of the review.
As I have said, all the information regarding the
documents extracted during the operations of reorganizing the archive
is now available on line, and constitutes a fundamental instrument
forcarrying out research into an outstandingly important figure
such as Giancarlo De Carlo.
|