Bologna's history has been largely determined by its geographical
position: set in the middle of that part of the of the Po valley
bounded by the River Po, the Adriatic Sea and the Tuscan-Aemilian
Apennine, the town became the natural meeting point for travellers
crossing Italy from north to south or from east to west. This
ease of access made this town a privileged centre for the exchange
of ideas and goods; over the centuries it fostered an important
cultural life (the university), manufacturing and commerce (the
city's trade fair). But the city's urban growth was limited and
the administrative decisions of previous decades were intended
to restrict drives towards expansion, so preserving a pattern
of development that for years was synonymous with a good quality
of life.
And yet in recent decades Bologna has also been affected by the
typical problems of medium-sized European cities: a sprawl of
inhabitants and functions from the inner city, loss of identity
in the outer-city suburbs, dispersal of the built up areas.
It has become increasingly difficult to govern these trends, which
are, in fact, capable of compromising the equilibrium of development
so effectively defended before. The result is that Bologna has
expanded well beyond the boundaries of the municipality growing
not only along the main radials but crowding, without any obvious
rules, most of the surrounding territory. In the old inner city,
offices have gradually ousted housing, banks small shops and everything
that is pushed outside the city seems destined find room in places
at a greater distance, with serious problems for mobility. This
is the problematic picture that emerges from the surveys conducted
in preparation for the Territorial Plan for the Province of Bologna.
The need to deal with Bologna's future by means of a far-ranging
project covering a very large area was the foundation of a long
and fertile period of supra-communal planning achievements. The
first attempt dates back to the 1960s, when Bologna had 500,000
inhabitants. The Inter-Communal Plan (PIC) aimed to establish
new facilities and logistic functions, to unite in a single plan
the interests and the decisions affecting the road network and
the availability of cheap working-class housing in the 15 municipalities
which, on a voluntary basis, took part in the project. The lesser
attention devoted to the production sector was one of the causes
of the problem of fragmentation of the production areas evident
today.
The PIC embodied some important decisions: the location of the
trade-fair pole, of Centergross, and the Interporto cargo hub
(all on the plain to the north of Bologna), the layout of the
new stretch of motorway, decentralisation of the university, etc.
This experience was followed by the Inter-Communal Urban Plan
(PUI), developed in the early 1980s in the context of the Master
Plan for the capital, which provided a supra-communal framework
for planning forecasts by the communes of the Bologna area, with
the aim of pursuing a comprehensive and coherent pattern of development,
above all in infrastructure and the areas of expansion, which
were again restricted and located along the main axes of communications.
The Communes participated in the PUI on a voluntary basis, as
they had done earlier in the PIC.
A decade later the Infra-Regional Territorial Plan (PTI) was approved:
this was the first to be drafted at the provincial level, in the
context of the recognition of the Province as a territorial authority
intermediate between the Region and Commune, under regional Law
142 of 1990, which invested it with powers that included responsibility
for planning. The Province of Bologna had drafted a planning instrument
with a progressive character whose main objectives were to contain
the dispersal of development, a phenomenon never recorded before
with the same intensity, and rationalise the transport network,
without neglecting protection of the natural environment and the
landscape. A hierarchy of urban centres was drafted, on the basis
of the types of connections that each of them had on the territorial
level, strengthening three priority axes of development to be
connected to the present and projected railway system.
Another opportunity offered by Law 142 was taken by the administrators
of the Bolognese area: the institution of the Metropolitan City
The mayors of almost all of the Municipalities of the province
of Bologna, united in the Urban Conference, had supported the
definition of a Scheme Director of the Metropolitan Territory,
a voluntary planning instrument for local planning decisions involving
supra-communal phenomena.