| address
|
The University of Liverpool
Gordon Stephenson Building
Liverpool L69 7ZQ
|
| telephone
|
0044 151 794 3128 |
| fax |
0044 151 794 3125 |
| url |
|
| editors |
Peter Batey
David W. Massey
|
| |
 |
|
| |
--------------- |
|
| |
 |
|
|
For Town Planning Review the first milestone was the foundation
of the Department of Civic Design at the University of Liverpool
in 1909, with the editing and publication of a journal on the new
subject of "town planning" among its basic duties. Patrick Abercrombie
became the iournal's editor and the first issue appeared in April
1910.
The early issues of the Review contained contributions from such
pioneers as: Thomas Adams, George Burdett Ford, Patrick Geddes,
Ebenezer Howard, Theodora Kimball, and Raymond Unwin. From the start,
as well as subjects related to planning in Britain, the coverage
of papers in the Review was international in scope, e.g. planning
schemes in America, the competition for the new Australian capital
at Canberra, and, not least, a set of extended essays on the planning
and design of Berlin, Brussels, Paris and Vienna.
The ambition of quarterly publication was broken in 1915 and issues
appeared on a rather haphazard schedule until Wesley Dougill joined
Abercrombie as co-editor in the later 1920s (becoming sole editor
in 1933) and established a regular Spring and Winter rhythm. The
few issues published in the "War Time Series" between 1940 and 1948
hardly reflected the momentous developments in town and regional
and rural planning in Britain at that time.
The post-war series of the Review commencing in April 1949 must
be counted as the second mile stone. Not only was there a new design
far the layout, typography and illustrations, a new and extended
editorial team under the leadership of Gordon Stephenson, but the
contents were re-shaped into a far more consistent set of editorial
notes, substantial articles and reviews with occasional discussion
items and extended pieces. And quarterly publication was resumed
far the first time since 1914. Stephenson followed an active editoriai
policy in seeking authors and papers and maintained the TPRs international
perspective. In effect he re-founded the iournal on the basis which
largely exists today.
More recent milestones have been the foundation (1979) of a companion
journal -Third World Planning review - specialising in planning
aspects of the less developed countries, and the establishment (1995)
of a "TPR Special Series" to provide far the publication of book
length sets of essays and monographs.
Town Planning Review today maintains both its founders' wide-ranging
view of the scope of "town planning' as an inclusive spatial planning
and their international perspective, although it is fair to comment
that the bulk of contributions reflect thejournal's British base
and its English-language medium.
While TPRs circulation is worldwide (mostly to OECD-type countries),
the readership focus has been increasingly directed towards the
scientific and research community rather than the professional and
practitioner of earlier days. This has been principally achieved
through the adoption of the academic 'blindfold' refereeing system.
There are three main features in the TPR today. First is a short
invited 'Viewpoint" on a topic of the day. The second (and main
section) consists of research and review papers submitted by authors
and occasional 'Policy Forum" debates. The third section covers
reviews of current books and other occasional media.

|